Thursday, March 21, 2013

How to Treat Burns With Running Water

The Research Report: How to Treat Burns With Running Water - WSJ.com
The Wall Street Journal by ANN LUKITS

Running cold tap water over accidental burns and scalds is generally accepted as the best way to cool the skin and prevent blistering. But a study in the Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery suggests the reverse—that using warm instead of cold water, while counterintuitive, may be a more effective method of limiting tissue damage and restoring blood flow to burned areas.

Swiss researchers used a heated metal template to induce same-size burns on anesthetized rats in four places on each of their backs. (Pain medication was administered before and after the procedure.)

One group of rats was treated for 20 minutes with gauze soaked in water cooled to 62.6 degrees Fahrenheit. A second group received gauze containing water at 98.6 degrees.

A third group of control rats wasn’t treated. The burns and unburned spaces between the burns were tested after one hour, 24 hours, four days and seven days.

Within 24 hours, burn damage in the control rats had extended to underlying tissues, whereas the burned area didn’t immediately change in the rats treated with cold or warm water, researchers said. After four days, all the animals developed tissue damage, or necrosis, in the spaces between the burns, but the damage was significantly less in the rats treated with warm water.

Necrosis affected 65% of interspaces in warm-water rats, 81% in cold-water rats and 94% in controls. Normal blood flow, assessed with a laser probe, was only restored in warm-water rats.

Although the experiments were performed on rats, the researchers said the basic principles and mechanisms of burn progression are similar to those in humans.

While applying cold tap water to burns helps to cool the skin, it can be painful after 20 minutes and leads to abnormally low temperature in the skin, according to lead researcher Reto Wettstein, a plastic and reconstructive hand surgeon in Basel, Switzerland. Dr. Wettstein personally practices rapid cooling with cold water for about a minute and then switches to warm water to help restore circulation.

Caveat: The findings only apply to second-degree burns that don’t require surgery, researchers said. The study didn’t consider other complications associated with burns, such as shock and the potential for hypothermia.


- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Vail Ct,Georgetown,United States

Saturday, March 16, 2013

That bright screen can keep you up at night

Bright Screens Could Delay Bedtime
Using a tablet or computer in the late evening disrupts the body's melatonin production

By Stephani Sutherland

If you have trouble sleeping, laptop or tablet use at bedtime might be to blame, new research suggests. Mariana Figueiro of the Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and her team showed that two hours of iPad use at maximum brightness was enough to suppress people's normal nighttime release of melatonin, a key hormone in the body's clock, or circadian system. Melatonin tells your body that it is night, helping to make you sleepy. If you delay that signal, Figueiro says, you could delay sleep. Other research indicates that “if you do that chronically, for many years, it can lead to disruption of the circadian system,” sometimes with serious health consequences, she explains.

The dose of light is important, Figueiro says; the brightness and exposure time, as well as the wavelength, determine whether it affects melatonin. Light in the blue-and-white range emitted by today's tablets can do the trick—as can laptops and desktop computers, which emit even more of the disrupting light but are usually positioned farther from the eyes, which ameliorates the light's effects. The team designed light-detector goggles and had subjects wear them during late-evening tablet use. The light dose measurements from the goggles correlated with hampered melatonin production.

On the bright side, a morning shot of screen time could be used as light therapy for seasonal affective disorder and other light-based problems. Figueiro hopes manufacturers will “get creative” with tomorrow's tablets, making them more “circadian friendly,” perhaps even switching to white text on a black screen at night to minimize the light dose. Until then, do your sleep schedule a favor and turn down the brightness of your glowing screens before bed—or switch back to good old-fashioned books.



- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown, TX

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

A little zap to the brain may ease depression

A Little Juice to the Brain Eases Depression
medpagetoday.com by Crystal Phend on February 6, 2013
By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: February 06, 2013


Non-invasive, electric stimulation of the brain appears to help the initial phase of treatment in major depressive disorder, especially in combination with an antidepressant, a double-blind trial showed.

Six weeks of daily transcranial direct current stimulation sessions reduced depression scores roughly the same as sertraline (Zoloft, P=0.35), Andre R. Brunoni, MD, PhD, of the University of São Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues reported online in JAMA Psychiatry.

The two together brought scores down by an average 8.5 points more than sertraline alone on a depression rating scale, and by 5.9 points more than direct current stimulation alone (P=0.002 and P=0.03, respectively).

A 3-point difference on that Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is considered clinically relevant.

“Noninvasive brain stimulation is becoming an established therapy for the treatment of depression,” Brunoni and colleagues wrote.

The weak electrical current applied across large electrodes on the scalp may work by boosting activity in an area of the brain known to be hypoactive in depression, with the advantage of not having the same adverse effects and contraindications as antidepressant drugs, the group pointed out.

The device also is relatively inexpensive, so it might be a “cost-effective alternative for regions with low resources where the prevalence of major depressive disorder is high, such as most developing nations,” they added.

However, the treatment is less practical than taking a pill, and it’s not clear how its results would hold up in the maintenance phase.

“Even if transcranial direct current stimulation becomes available for in-house use, it would still require 20- to 30-minute daily sessions for several weeks,” Brunoni’s group wrote.

Their Sertraline vs Electrical Current Therapy for Treating Depression Clinical Study (SELECT TDCS) compared in a two-by-two design treatment with 6 weeks of sertraline at 50 mg per day or placebo and 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (30-minute sessions each weekday plus two extra sessions every other week) or sham.

It included 120 antidepressant-naive patients with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder but no psychotic or bipolar component, seen at a single outpatient center in an academic setting in São Paulo. The cohort had a relatively low degree of refractoriness and short duration of the index episode.

The only thing that wasn’t better than inactive treatment at the end of the 6-week period was sertraline alone, with a mean difference of 2.9 points versus placebo (P=0.20).

The explanation may have been that 50 mg per day was a low dose for some participants, though there have been negative trials with sertraline in major depressive disorder, the researchers pointed out.

Transcranial direct current stimulation improved MADRS score by 5.6 points over sham (P=0.01).

The combination of the two appeared to work fastest, as that was the only group with a significant change in score at week two. Factorial analysis suggested that the initial effect was driven primarily by the electric stimulation treatment.

The two appeared to be additive rather than synergistic.

Clinical response with at least a 50% reduction in baseline MADRS score was significantly more common with transcranial direct current stimulation or combination treatment than with placebo (43% and 63% versus 17%).

Remission, with MADRS score falling to 10 points or less, occurred in 47% of the combo group and 40% of the electrical stimulation group, which were both significantly better than the 13% rate with placebo.

Sertraline alone induced remission in 30%, although this difference didn’t reach significance.

No negative cognitive effects were seen with transcranial direct current stimulation, though skin redness was more common at the end of week two.

Of the seven episodes of treatment-emergent mania or hypomania, five were in the combined treatment group, including one severe manic episode requiring pharmacologic intervention.

Mania or hypomania induction may be similar with transcranial direct current stimulation as with antidepressants, so such events need careful monitoring in future trials, Brunoni’s group noted.

Further research is needed into longer-term effects and into use in the inpatient setting, they added.

Their trial includes an open-label phase for sham nonresponders to cross over to 10 days of active transcranial direct current stimulation, as well as a 6-month follow-up phase for those who responded to active treatment in the first 6 weeks.

The study was funded by a grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation.

The researchers reported having no conflicts of interest to disclose.

medpagetoday.com by Crystal Phend on February 6, 2013 • Report a text problem



- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown,TX

Friday, March 8, 2013

Keep Calm and Carry a Gizmo

Keep Calm and Carry a Gizmo - WSJ.com

Sergio Ruzzier for The Wall Street Journal

IT WAS A COOL 68 DEGREES in the car, yet my forehead was beading with sweat. I-405 was a slow-rolling conveyor belt of anxiety. My palms were hot. My mind raced. Was that BMW really going to cut me off again?

But I had a solution. I pulled over at the next exit and did what any nerd-in-the-know would do: I plugged a stress-management device into my iPhone, fired up a relaxation guide and let go.

With finger on sensor, I inhaled and exhaled while following a bouncing ball on the screen, “breathing from the heart,” as the instructions told me. Within 60 seconds, I felt calm and collected, ready to face the 33 miles of stop-and-go ahead. I slipped back into traffic, a monk. I was home before I knew it.

Normally, I find technology to be a source of stress: social networks make me feel like I have no life; my blood boils over the emails I read before bedtime; hours spent staring at a screen have turned my lower back into a tight band of doom. Sure, I turn to other outlets to release stress—exercise, meditation, single-malt scotch—but like an email newsletter from a travel site, it just keeps coming back. But what if the very gadgets causing my angst could be used to combat the stress they create? A handful of devices promise to do just that. They quantify your stress level by calculating your heart rate and the minute variations in the time between each beat, a measurement known as heart rate variability (HRV), which has been used to gauge the likelihood of mortality after a heart attack and to help assess certain psychiatric conditions. If the gadgets find that you should unwind, they’ll attempt to guide you to a more centered state through relaxation exercises. Some use simple animations that you follow with deep breaths. Others offer video with experts like Andrew Weil and Thich Nhat Hanh, who lead you through a short meditation or even a series of yoga poses. Gadgets that can lower my stress and teach me to calm down? I was in. Was it all too good to be true, though? Some of the language I read reeked of snake oil, and the devices and apps often assessed my stress level inconsistently. One might tell me I was calm, while another advised me that I needed to cool down, so take their readings with a grain of salt if you choose to hop on board. But if you’re like me, you just might come out the other side more mellow, with your gadgets looking less like stressors and more like digital therapists.

The emWave2 is the most complex of the devices that I looked at, but it was also the most accurate. It consists of a heart-rate sensor that clips onto your earlobe and an iPod-size device that can send your data to a Mac or Windows computer via USB. (The emWave2 also has an onboard thumb sensor that wasn’t nearly as accurate.) While you can use the emWave 2 without a computer, I found the PC-based experience to be more immersive.

Before I could begin using the emWave2, I had to install it—a procedure that was, ironically, pretty stressful. It required loading software and drivers from a CD-ROM (remember those?) and then restarting my computer, which modern software rarely does. Thirty minutes and two computer crashes later, the emWave2 was up and running. There I sat with the device pulsing blue light, a pile of documentation strewed about my desk, a wire hanging from my ear. My wife peeked in at me from the office door, eyebrow raised.

I fired up the emWave2 software, the device calibrated and I saw a graph of my HRV being drawn on my computer screen in real time. I was fascinated. And according to the device, I needed to chill. I ran a coaching program intended to help me build my “coherence”—focusing on my heart, breathing from my center, “activating” a positive feeling. I breathed in as a little ball on the screen floated up, out as it descended, and gazed upon images of serene mountain brooks. Although I was skeptical at first, I genuinely felt better by the end of it all.

If only the software could be brought up to date, I could see legions of strung-out geeks like me becoming addicted servants of this device. Wasn’t there a “Star Trek” episode about this? $229, heartmathstore.com F. Martin Ramin for The Wall Street Journal Zensorium Tinké Zensorium TinkéThe Tinké is a cute dongle that measures HRV, blood oxygen level and respiratory rate with a built-in thumb sensor. It connects to an iPhone, iPad or iPod Touch’s 30-pin connector (using the Tinké with newer Lightning-equipped iOS devices requires an adapter); an accompanying app processes your stats. From a design standpoint, the Tinké was the clear stand out: pretty, colorful and simple.

The Tinké was also easy to use. I plugged the device into the iPhone, downloaded the app, ran a quick calibration and was measuring my stress levels in minutes. The Tinké was especially convenient to use on the go, which is exactly when I needed it most, whether dealing with Los Angeles traffic or coming down after a gym session. Its portability is easily its best feature.

That said, the app’s interface is cramped, and it offers only one relaxation exercise, in which you follow expanding and contracting circles with your breath. Although it’s effective, the breadth of exercises offered by the other devices left me wishing for more here. The Tinké’s thumb sensor could be temperamental, too. To take an accurate reading, it requires that you exert constant, consistent pressure. I often found myself more concerned with holding the device properly than getting my breathing in line.

Because of this, I had a hard time trusting the unit. My “Vita” score—a measure of cardiorespiratory fitness compiled by assessing my blood-oxygen saturation levels and heart and respiratory rates—was constantly high and healthy. My “Zen Index,” on the other hand, never rose above 34, indicating that, despite my heart health, I was constantly stressed out. Even after doing multiple relaxation exercises and verifying my improved HRV with the emWave2, the Tinké’s reading didn’t budge past 34. Perhaps it was waiting for me to pass out from all the deep-breathing exercises it led me through.

Apart from its wonky readings on the Zen side, the Tinké’s simplicity provided me with the shortest route to relaxation. I found myself returning to the unit more than any other because it was so easy to take along. Carrying it in my pocket was a constant reminder to relax. $119, zensorium.com F. Martin Ramin for The Wall Street Journal (phone)

GPS for the Soul GPS for the SoulThis recently launched Huffington Post app for the iPhone 4, 4S and 5 uses HRV-sensing technology developed by HeartMath, the same company behind the emWave2. It requires no additional hardware; the app measures HRV with the iPhone’s camera and flash. It also has a stress-reducing price: free. I found the emWave2 and its earpiece to be the most accurate, the Tinké’s dongle less so. It was no surprise, then, that this sensorless app was the flakiest of all. Getting accurate readings with the app required placing my index finger gingerly over my iPhone’s camera lens and flash for 80 seconds. If I moved too much, the app would suggest that I rub my fingers together and start again. A few rounds of this was enough to elevate my stress level. But do you really need an app to tell you that you’re strung out? If not, GPS for the Soul truly shines. It features dozens of stress-relieving guides from various experts and wellness companies: A video with the Zen Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh teaches you how to move mindfully; instructors from the Kripalu yoga center demonstrate the cat/cow pose; Dr. Andrew Weil leads you through a simple breathing exercise. I also appreciated that I could have the app remind me to “check-in.” I normally find it annoying when apps do this, but it was helpful to be reminded to de-stress in the middle of hectic days. Free, huffingtonpost.com/gps-for-the-soul/ Explore More Keeping Fit, One Step at a Time
Bicyclists of a Feather Flock Together
A version of this article appeared January 5, 2013, on page D11 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: KeepCalmandCarryaGizmo.




- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown Tx

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Skin Cells to Brain Cells? Yes and it may help MS Patients

Stem Cell Advance Could Aid in Multiple Sclerosis - WSJ.com
The Wall Street Journal by GAUTAM NAIK


Scientists have converted human skin cells into brain cells and used them to treat mice with myelin disorders, a family of diseases that includes multiple sclerosis.

The research, reported Thursday, marks another promising advance for a technique known as cell reprogramming. The approach returns mature cells to an embryonic-like state, and then transforms them into various types of fresh, healthy tissue that could be used to treat diseases.

Multiple sclerosis is the most common myelin disorder. It strikes when the body’s own immune system attacks myelin, the coating around nerve fibers. That disrupts communication between cells and can cause problems related to muscle movement, balance and vision.

In the latest study, the reprogramming technique “led to the re-myelination of the complete nervous system” of diseased animals, improving their symptoms and prolonging their life, said Steven Goldman, lead author of the report and a neurologist at University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, N.Y.

The findings appear in the journal Cell Stem Cell.

Myelin is made in cells known as oligodendrocytes. Those, in turn, are the offspring of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, or OPCs.

One way to tackle a malady like multiple sclerosis is to transplant healthy, lab-made OPCs into the diseased brain, which could restore the lost myelin and reverse the damage from the disease.

Dr. Goldman’s team first reprogrammed human skin cells into embryonic-like stem cells. Then they identified the cascade of chemical signals used by the body to turn embryonic cells into OPCs—and replicated that process in a lab dish.

It was hard to do, mainly because OPCs form very late in the body’s development, via a multistage and complex process. It took the researchers six years to decipher the signals and to produce and purify enough OPCs that would yield sufficient myelin.

The OPCs were transplanted into mice with leukodystrophy, a hereditary condition that rendered them incapable of producing myelin. (Each year, thousands of children are born in the U.S. with some form of leukodystrophy.)

In the experiment, untreated mice displayed the typical symptoms of myelin-loss as they grew older: They developed tremors, lost their sense of balance and died prematurely, often from seizures.

The treated group initially also developed tremors and other symptoms. But once the transplanted cells began to produce sufficient myelin—it took four months—their symptoms improved and they no longer died of seizures.

Dr. Goldman said he hopes to start human trials using the cell-transplantation approach in 2015.

Write to Gautam Naik at gautam.naik@wsj.com

A version of this article appeared February 8, 2013, on page A6 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Research Offers New Hope for Multiple Sclerosis.


- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown TX

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Inexpensive card-sized device runs 50 blood tests in seconds

Inexpensive card-sized device runs 50 blood tests in seconds
By Ben Coxworth

December 31, 2012

Ordinarily, when medical clinicians are conducting blood tests, it’s a somewhat elaborate affair. A full vial of blood must be drawn, individual portions of which are then loaded into large, expensive machines such as mass spectrometers. The results are usually quite accurate, but they’re not instantaneous, and require the services of trained personnel in a well-equipped lab. That may be about to change, however. Scientists from Houston’s Methodist Hospital Research Institute and MD Anderson Cancer Center have created a credit card-sized gadget, that can instantly check a single drop of blood for up to 50 different substances – and it costs about US$10.

Developed by a team led by Dr. Lidong Qin, the device is known as a volumetric bar-chart chip – or the V-chip, for short.

It consists of two thin sheets of glass, with a series of 50 tiny wells sandwiched between them. Each of those wells can contain different types of antibodies, selected for their tendency to bind to specific proteins. All of the wells also contain an enzyme known as catalase, along with hydrogen peroxide, and a dye. A sample drop of blood or other bodily fluid is placed in another well, at one end of the V-chip.

Initially, all of the wells are isolated from one another. When the two glass plates are slid against one another, however, the wells are linked by one long continuous zig-zagging microfluidic channel. The sample fluid flows along that channel, going through each of the wells as it does so.

When the antibodies in any one of the wells react with the targeted substance – such as insulin, or a specific drug or virus – the catalase is activated, which in turn splits the hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen gas. That gas pushes the dye up a column linked to the well, where it can be seen by the user. The higher the dye goes in that column, the greater the amount of the substance in the sample. Viewed as a whole, the V-chip appears as a bar chart, indicating the relative amounts of the various targeted substances.

Although lab tests would likely still be the way to go for the most accurate, detailed results possible, the V-chip could prove very useful in places like developing nations, where laboratories are inaccessible or non-existent. It could also find use in emergency rooms or ambulances, where caregivers need to detect the presence of specific drugs or poisons as fast as possible.

Qin and his team are now working on making the V-chip more user-friendly. A paper on the research was recently published in the journal Nature Communications, which also features a video on the device.



- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown Tx

Saturday, February 9, 2013

A bionic eye may be closer


The Quest to Create a Bionic Eye Gets Clearer
By SHIRLEY S. WANG

Have scientists finally created a bionic eye? The quest to develop a device that will give some blind people vision again, a retinal prosthesis, has been challenging. Shirley Wang joins Lunch Break with the latest on the research. Photo: Second Sight.

Restoring sight to the blind has proved particularly challenging for scientists, but a new technology combining an eye implant and video-camera-enabled glasses may soon be available in the U.S.

Researchers have been pursuing the development of such a bionic eye for decades, in some cases spending hundreds of millions of dollars to tackle engineering challenges. One device designed to help people with a rare eye condition is awaiting U.S. regulatory approval. It is known as Argus II, made by Second Sight Medical Products Inc. of Sylmar, Calif. Other researchers, including at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University, continue to work on what they believe are even more sophisticated versions.


Second Sight's product uses what is known as a retinal prosthesis that bypasses the dead or damaged cells in the eye needed to detect light. Instead, the device reroutes visual data via the implant to parts of the eye that still work. Like other similar devices under development, it uses a video camera embedded in a pair of eyeglasses to collect visual input in the form of light and transmit it to the implant as an electrical signal.

If Argus II is approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it would be the first retinal prosthesis to hit the market in the U.S. The device is already available in Europe.

The patients most likely to benefit from these devices are those with retinitis pigmentosa, a rare disease that damages and kills the cells in the retina—a tissue layer at the back of the eye—that process light. For people with the condition, their vision grows increasingly blurry until they eventually can't see at all. Some 100,000 patients in the U.S. have the condition.

Another group of patients who may find such technology useful, scientists say, is those with severe macular degeneration. This is an age-related disease that damages the part of the eye that perceives fine detail, according to the National Eye Institute. The various retinal prostheses under development all use video cameras to send light information to chip implants. Most of them use the data to trigger electrodes in the chip to stimulate pixels of light on the retina, which are then processed normally by the brain as images.

The technology tested to date lets the wearer primarily see in black and white. It is most useful for seeing sharp contrasts, such as the painted white line of a crosswalk on a dark road. But scientists hope that they can improve the detail to eventually enable color vision in its wearers.

Barbara Campbell, a 59-year-old vocational rehabilitation counselor, has had virtually no sight since her 40s. She had the Argus II implanted in her left eye in 2009 after hearing about the device through her work at the New York state Commission for the Blind and Visually Handicapped.

Though she was told the device was experimental, Ms. Campbell thought, "anything I gain will be a plus," she said.

Ms. Campbell had a five-hour surgery at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and two months later was fitted for the video glasses. Returning to her apartment, she could see that the light fixtures in the hallway of her building were different from how she remembered they used to be.

While her vision is still limited to discerning large objects such as furniture, she said, she can now see the pole at her bus stop instead of having to locate people standing nearby. When she goes to the theater, she can follow the actors on stage, though she cannot see their facial expressions.

"It's very exciting and it's very cool," Ms. Campbell said. "I felt that my brain now had to become used to using vision again," she said.

Some 50 patients, including Ms. Campbell, have been implanted with the Argus II, with two-thirds of them experiencing benefits. The patients who respond the best can read large letters a few inches tall. Patients report the biggest gains are in improved orientation and mobility, said Robert Greenberg, Second Sight's CEO, who also is a medical doctor.

Designing a bionic eye has been much more difficult than developing other types of aids, such as a cochlear implant for hearing, say scientists. For one thing, visual information is two-dimensional—both horizontal and vertical coordinates must be sent to the brain—while sound waves needed for hearing are one-dimensional.

Another challenge is protecting the implant in the eye, since it essentially has to sit in a bath of organic liquid. "It's like taking your television and throwing it in the ocean and expecting it to work," said Dr. Greenberg. Scientists have spent time working out how to manufacture tiny, airtight boxes that can shield implants when they are in the eye.

A big obstacle has been figuring out how to adequately capture and stimulate enough pixels of light on the retina to produce a clear image. Normal vision is based on more than one hundred million receptors in each eye, but it is impossible to squeeze that many electrodes into a tiny device that has to lay on the retina, said John Wyatt, a professor in the department of electrical engineering at MIT who has been working on a retinal prosthesis since 1988.

Second Sight's Argus II contains 60 electrodes, but some other scientists say that for a retinal prosthesis to be truly useful to patients, hundreds are needed. "In theory, you'd like to have more electrodes, but not if it means an implant that doesn't survive more than a few months" because the device is too bulky and unstable to stay in place in the eye, Dr. Greenberg said. "That was the trade-off we made."

Instead, the company is working to create better video cameras and software, which are external to the eye and easily updated, to better enhance and interpret the information sent to the implant, he said.

Dr. Wyatt and his group at MIT are developing a bionic eye that will contain between 256 and 400 electrodes. They are currently working on their fifth version. Earlier models have been implanted successfully in Yucatán miniature pigs and temporarily in six humans. They are planning to form a company to commercialize their technology.

At Stanford University, ophthalmology professor Daniel Palanker's group has taken a different approach to the problem. Instead of using electrodes, his team developed rows of tiny "photovoltaic" pixels (like solar panels), powered by the pulsed light from the video goggles, which are implanted under the retina. These implants convert light into electric current that stimulates local retinal neurons, which then send signals to the brain, meaning no wires are necessary to stimulate the retina.

Using this technology, Dr. Palanker expects to be able to fit enough light-powered panels to stimulate 5,000 pixels in a space similar to what the other retinal prostheses use. The device is currently being tested in rats and is expected to begin a human trial in a year or two, he said.

Write to Shirley S. Wang at shirley.wang@wsj.com

A version of this article appeared January 29, 2013, on page D1 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Quest To Create A Bionic Eye Gets Clearer.


- Posted using from my iPad HD

Location:Georgetown, TX